<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SOTUS recap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xtra-rant.com/2006/02/01/1735/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xtra-rant.com/2006/02/01/1735/</link>
	<description>Taking Myself Way Too Seriously Since 1999</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:05:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.xtra-rant.com/2006/02/01/1735/comment-page-1/#comment-8296</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 20:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xtra-rant.com/?p=1735#comment-8296</guid>
		<description>We found that interesting, too. No idea where that came from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We found that interesting, too. No idea where that came from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smokey.Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.xtra-rant.com/2006/02/01/1735/comment-page-1/#comment-8295</link>
		<dc:creator>Smokey.Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 19:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xtra-rant.com/?p=1735#comment-8295</guid>
		<description>OK, he asked for the line item veto, which Clinton got in &#039;96, but it was ruled unconstitutional by a federal judge in &#039;98. (http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-truth1feb01,0,1999790.story?coll=la-home-headlines)
(http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/2/1/115532/0081)

Hmm, makes you wonder more about the decision to get Alito on the SC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, he asked for the line item veto, which Clinton got in &#8216;96, but it was ruled unconstitutional by a federal judge in &#8216;98. (<a rel='nofollow' href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-truth1feb01,0,1999790.story?coll=la-home-headlines" rel="nofollow">http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-truth1feb01,0,19 99790.story?coll=la-home-headlines</a>)<br />
(<a rel='nofollow' href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/2/1/115532/0081" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/2/1/115532/0081</a>)</p>
<p>Hmm, makes you wonder more about the decision to get Alito on the SC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
